Legal Opinion

Seabrook Citizens for the Defense of Home Rule v. Yankee Greyhound Racing, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 18, 1983No. 81-420PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, J.

The plaintiffs, members of an unincorporated association of residents and voters in the Town of Seabrook, filed a petition against the defendants, the State of New Hampshire, the New *106Hampshire Greyhound Racing Commission, and Yankee Greyhound Racing, Inc. They sought temporary and permanent injunctions against the licensing and operation of Sunday dog racing at Yankee Greyhound’s dog-racing facility in Seabrook and a ruling that RSA 284:17-a, :17-b (Supp. 1981), which repealed local option control over Sunday dog racing, was unconstitutional. Additionally, they sought damages.

The plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Estate of Cargill v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  2. Region 10 Client Management, Inc. v. Town of HampsteadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  3. Grinnell v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  4. Public Service Co. v. Town of HamptonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  5. Estate of Kennett v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. LaFranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  2. Dugas v. Town of ConwaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  3. Town of Seabrook v. State of New Hampshire, Seabrook Citizens for the Defense of Home Rule (Scdhr), IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  4. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  5. Vernet v. Town of ExeterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API