North Hampton Racing & Breeding Ass'n v. New Hampshire Racing Commission
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBurque, J.
In the view we have taken of the present case it is wholly unnecessary to consider or determine the question as to whether or not certiorari is the proper remedy. Blake v. Railroad, 39 N. H. 435, 436. “All parties desire a decision. ... In this situation, the questions have been considered without reference to any defect in the form of the petition.” Barber v. Board, 82 N. H. 426, 427. We granted certiorari because of the important question of law involved. Having granted it and heard the parties on the merits of the issue raised therein, we proceed to the direct consideration of the case. In…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- American Baseball Club v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- State Ex Inf. McKittrick v. WymoreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
3Cited by19 opinions
- Geraldine C. Medina v. Warren B. RudmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- Kansas Racing Management, Inc. v. Kansas Racing CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
- Town of Nottingham v. HarveySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Appeal of RowanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- Hann v. MerrillSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.