Legal Opinion
6th Camden Corp. v. Evesham Tp., Burlington Cty.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 2, 1976No. Civ. A. 74-1194PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROTMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff, the Sixth Camden Corporation, is a land developer that sought to build a shopping center in Evesham Township, Burlington County, New Jersey. It brings this action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985(3), and 1986, and the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment, to redress asserted violations of its constitutional rights. Jurisdiction of the court is challenged, but plaintiff invokes 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1343(3).
Although other acts and theories are alleged, the principal thrust of the complaint is that the defendants wrongfully…
2Cases cited139 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
134 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Herrington v. County of SonomaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Gentile v. WallenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Owen v. City of IndependenceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- Gentile v. WallenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Rutherford v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.