Legal Opinion

Holt v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 3, 1956No. 353-52PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadden, Judge

The plaintiff, a retired Naval officer, seeks retirement pay from the date of his release from active duty on November 27,1945, to the time when he was actually placed on the retired list effective January 1, 1949. The facts have been agreed upon in a pretrial conference.

Plaintiff was graduated from the United States Naval Academy in June 1933. From that time he served in the United States Marine Corps until April 1942 when he was commissioned in the Naval Reserve and ordered to active duty. He remained on active duty until November 27, 1945.

After his return from duty in the Pacific area he,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hamrick v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
  2. Ramsey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  2. Betty Friedman, of the Estate of Joseph Friedman, Deceased v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  3. Betty Friedman, of the Estate of Joseph Friedman, Deceased v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  4. Boraiko v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959
  5. James D. Morrow v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API