Legal Opinion

Hamrick v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 1, 1951No. 49496PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff, a naval reserve officer on active duty, was found by a Naval Retiring Board to be permanently incapacitated for active naval service by reason of diabetes mellitus. The retiring board found that this incapacity existed before he entered the Navy. As a result of the retiring board’s decision plaintiff was released from active duty without pay on February 10, 1946, although the proceedings and findings of the board were not approved by the President until February 26, 1946. Plaintiff thereupon appealed the decision of the Naval Retiring Board to the Naval Retiring…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lemly v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948
  2. Denby v. BerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Robertson v. ChambersSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Womer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1949
  5. Lemly v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  2. Almour v. Pace, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
  3. Ray v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  4. Carlisle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  5. Updike v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API