Legal Opinion

Sells v. Elmergreen

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1924PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEschweiler, J.

The civil court acquired jurisdiction of the parties and over the separate causes of action embodied in the plaintiff’s complaint and the defendant’s counterclaims as first interposed. The amendment properly allowed to the second counterclaim, increasing the amount involved to an excess of the statutory limit of the civil court’s jurisdiction, could have no effect upon its jurisdiction to proceed with the matters still properly before it.

The defendant might have asserted the counterclaim embodied in his amended pleading by an independent action in a court having such jurisdiction. His…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Martin v. EastmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Duresen v. BlackmarrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  3. Nelson v. MeyerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
  4. Kienzle v. GardnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1906

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Division 525, Order of Ry. Conductors of America v. GormanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
  2. Maraldo v. HendricksOhio Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. Orlandini v. GunsburgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API