Duresen v. Blackmarr
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the municipal court of Minneapolis to recover $255 damages for injuries to plaintiff’s wagon and horses, caused by collision with defendant’s automobile. In his answer defendant Black-man- alleged that the collision was due solely to plaintiff’s negligence, and interposed a counterclaim for $3,000 for injuries sustained. Erom an order overruling plaintiff’s demurrer to the counterclaim, he appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
This action was brought in the municipal court of the city of Minneapolis to recover the sum of $255, damages alleged to have been *207suffered by plaintiff as a result of a collision between his team and wagon and defendant’s automobile; the complaint alleging that the collision was caused by the negligent operation of the automobile. Defendant Blackmarr, the driver of the automobile, interposed a counterclaim for $3,050, for injuries to his person from the collision, which, the answer alleges, was caused by the negligence of plaintiff. Plaintiff demurred to the answer, on the ground that the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Howard Iron Works v. Buffalo Elevating Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
- General Electric Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- Jordahl v. BerrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Temple v. Niagara Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Murphy v. EvansIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Johnson Service Co. v. KruseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Sewing Machine Co. v. . BurgerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. BurgerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Sells v. ElmergreenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
- Juster v. Court of HonorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.