Legal Opinion

Martin v. Eastman

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1901PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Iowa ■county: Geoe&e ClbmeNtsoN, Circuit Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Cassobay, O. J.

This action was commenced in a justice’s •court to recover $156.32, and interest from January 1,1895, us the balance due the plaintiff for the erection and construction of a hot-water heating plant for the defendant, at his instance and request, and certain items of extras to the *288amount of $25. The defendant answered by way of admitting such amount for extras to the extent of $21.32, and denials and counter allegations as to the balance, to the effect that he had paid thereon $275, and also alleged, by way of a counterclaim, in effect, that the defendant agreed and warranted…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McLennan v. PrenticeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Park v. Richardson & Boynton Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Cooban v. BryantWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Vilas v. McDonough Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Henckel v. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1881

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Duresen v. BlackmarrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  2. Nelson v. MeyerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
  3. Dyett v. HarneySupreme Court of Colorado · 1912
  4. Regina Co. v. GallowayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Sells v. ElmergreenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API