Legal Opinion

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Perry

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1999No. 99-1163PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. A suspension from the practice of law with a portion of the suspension stayed is an appropriate sanction for respondent’s violations of DR 1—102(A)(6) and Gov.Bar R. V(4)(G). See, e.g., Disciplinary Counsel v. Fortado (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 604, 660 N.E.2d 1154; see, also, Disciplinary Counsel v. Gosling (1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 113, 679 N.E.2d 1096; Disciplinary Counsel v. Vazquez (1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 295, 677 N.E.2d 804. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for eighteen months, with one year stayed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. FortadoOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. GoslingOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. VazquezOhio Supreme Court · 1997

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. PerryOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. KingOhio Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API