Princeton Sportswear Corp. v. Redevelopment Authority
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
*276OPINION OF THE COURT
POMEROY, Justice.
The question presented by this appeal is whether the trial court was correct in sustaining preliminary objections to appellant’s complaint in mandamus, and dismissing the suit. Unfortunately, several deficiencies in the record before us make it impossible to give an informed answer to the question. We will therefore reverse and remand.
The background of the present action is an eminent domain proceeding wherein the appellant was the condemnee and the appellee Authority was the condemnor. While no part of the record in that case is included in the record now…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Unger v. Hampton TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Valley Forge Racing Ass'n v. State Horse Racing CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Philadelphia Presbytery Homes, Inc. v. Abington Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Peters Sportswear Co., Inc. v. Eastland Woolen Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
3Cited by13 opinions
- County of Allegheny v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. JeromeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Canonsburg General Hospital v. Department of HealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Equitable Gas Co. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Barros v. MartinCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.