Legal Opinion

Peters Sportswear Co., Inc. v. Eastland Woolen Mills, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 26, 1967No. Appeal, No. 283PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Cohen,

Plaintiff, a Pennsylvania corporation, commenced an action of assumpsit by causing a writ of foreign at*136tachment to be issued against defendant, a foreign corporation. Because it held accounts receivable from defendant, plaintiff named itself as garnishee,1 was served with the writ and complaint, and forwarded copies to defendant as required by Pa. R. C. P. 1267. Pursuant to Rule 1271, defendant filed preliminary objections raising a question of jurisdiction and alleging that at the time of service of the attachment, plaintiff, as garnishee, had no property of…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. LUITWEILER v. Northchester Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Princeton Sportswear Corp. v. Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Peters Sportswear Co. v. American Arbitration Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Princeton Sportswear Corp. v. Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API