Equitable Gas Co. v. City of Pittsburgh
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIX, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from an Order of the Commonwealth Court dismissing preliminary objections and granting peremptory judgment in mandamus for Equitable Gas Company (“Equitable”) and the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (“PUC”) against the City of Pittsburgh (“City”). The result reached by the Commonwealth Court seriously undercuts a carefully designed legislative scheme intended to provide the municipality with a right of set-off against persons having claims or accounts against the political subdivision. The Commonwealth Court has also ignored the clear…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bronson v. Commonwealth Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Travis v. TeterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. JeromeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Francis v. CorletoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Canonsburg General Hospital v. Department of HealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- County of Allegheny v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Pennsylvania Dental Ass'n v. Commonwealth Insurance DepartmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Pennsylvania State Lodge, Fraternal Order of Police v. Commonwealth, Department of Conservation & Natural ResourcesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Mueller v. PA. STATE POLICE HDQTRS.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Contrans, Inc. v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.