Webster v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtSlack, J.
The plaintiff was riding in an automobile owned and driven by one McNair when it was struck by one of the defendant’s engines on a grade crossing in the village of Bast Barnet, and he received the injuries for which he is seeking to recover. He had a verdict and judgment below, and the case is here on defendant’s exceptions.
The negligence charged is failure to give the statutory signals, failure to sound the bell which defendant had installed at the crossing, and excessive speed of the engine at the crossing. At the close of all the evidence defendant moved for a directed verdict' on the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Cotton v. Willmar & Sioux Falls Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Higgins, Admr. v. MetzgerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1928
- Wellman, Admr. v. WalesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925
- Clarke v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
- Gover v. Central Vermont Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1922
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. CoburnSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
- Bates v. Rutland Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1933
- Lindekugel v. Spokane, P. & S. Ry. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1935
- Stone v. WoodSupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
- Lemieux v. Leonard Construction Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.