Legal Opinion

Lindekugel v. Spokane, P. & S. Ry. Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1935PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

At about 3 o’clock a. m. of June 20, 1931, a train consisting of an engine, a tender and a caboose operated by defendant collided with, plaintiff’s automobile at a place between Portland and Linnton where Ferry street crosses defendant’s railroad track. As a result plaintiff sustained personal injuries.

At the close of the testimony, defendant moved for a directed verdict in its favor upon the ground, among others, that the evidence established as a matter of law that plaintiff’s alleged negligence caused or contributed to cause the accident. The refusal of the trial court to grant this motion…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Wellons' AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
  2. Perkins v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  3. Olds v. HinesOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Debes v. GreenstoneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  5. Kirby v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1923

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Landers v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. v. HicksArizona Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Niemi v. SpragueAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937
  4. Tate v. BorgmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Patterson v. Chicago, R. I. P. R. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API