Legal Opinion

Goade v. Vollrath

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided December 24, 1948No. 694PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIDGE, District Judge.

The exact boundary between matters of procedure and matters of substantive right is not precisely defined in our jurisprudence. However, in causes removed from State courts to Federal courts certain clearly established rules have been announced from which, in view of the celebrated decision of our Supreme Court in Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64, 58 S.Ct. 817, 82 L.Ed. 1188, 114 A.L.R. 1487, it would seem apparent that rights acquired by parties in removal actions whether characterized either as “substantive” or “procedural” rights, must be recognized and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Wichita Royalty Co. v. City National Bank of Wichita FallsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Duncan v. GeganSupreme Court of the United States · 1880

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Talley v. American Bakeries Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1954
  2. Ultronic Systems Corp. v. Ultronix, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1963
  3. Pointer v. GhavamDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1985
  4. Spelbrink v. JacobsDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1977
  5. Gillum v. Skelly Oil Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API