Legal Opinion
Moorlane Company v. Highway Department
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided October 26, 1964No. 7408PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NORTHCUTT, Justice.
This is a suit for damages in the nature of inverse condemnation. Appellants, plaintiffs below, brought this action against the State of Texas, the Highway Department of the State of Texas, and the City of Amarillo seeking to recover compensation for an alleged partial taking of the property rights of access.
Appellants are the owner and lessee of Lots 3, 4, and 5, Block No. 3 of the Glidden and Sanborn addition to the City of Amarillo. This property abuts upon the west side of Pierce Street and the north side of South Second Street in the City of Amarillo. Located on or…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lombardo v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1934
- City of San Antonio v. Pigeonhole Parking of Texas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1958
- Pennysavers Oil Co. of Texas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
- City of San Antonio v. FetzerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Harper v. City of Wichita FallsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- DuPuy v. City of WacoTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- City of Austin v. TeagueTexas Supreme Court · 1978
- City of Houston v. FoxTexas Supreme Court · 1969
- City of Waco v. Archenhold Automobile Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1964
- Collins v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.