Pavlik v. State, Department of Community & Regional Affairs
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CONNOR, Justice.
This appeal arises from an action challenging the annexation of land to the City of Yakutat. The superior court entered summary judgment for the defendants on the basis of laches and equitable estoppel. We affirm.
On October 8, 1973, the City of Yakutat petitioned the Local Boundary Commission to annex certain adjacent land.1 On May 23, 1975, the commission held a properly noticed hearing2 on the petition. The area in which the twelve appellants live was not originally part of the land considered for annexation. These landowners and residents, therefore, did not attend…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Moore v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Concerned Citizens of South Kenai Peninsula v. Kenai Peninsula BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Palfy v. RiceAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
- Tobeluk Ex Rel. Tobeluk v. LindAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Wolff v. Arctic Bowl, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kodiak Electric Ass'n v. Delaval Turbine, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1984
- Miscovich v. TryckAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
- City and Borough of Juneau v. BreckAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Burke v. MakaAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- Vockner v. EricksonAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.