Legal Opinion
Vockner v. Erickson
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided January 10, 1986No. S-421PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.
This appeal arises from the superior court’s ruling that the contract between Bernd Vockner and Leo Erickson, concerning the purchase of Erickson’s apartment house, was unconscionable.
I. FACTS.
In the spring of 1975, Erickson, then seventy-three years of age, ran an advertisement offering a twelve-person boarding house for sale. Bernd Vockner, a real estate agent, answered the advertisement and arranged to meet with Erickson. When Vockner arrived at the boarding house on the evening of April 30, 1975, Erickson informed him that the boarding house was not for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Moore v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Morrow v. New Moon Homes, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Campbell Soup Co. v. LojeskiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Johnson v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1976
- Young v. WilliamsAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Horton v. HansenAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
- Helstrom v. North Slope BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
- Fireman's Fund Mortgage Corp. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1992
- Municipality of Anchorage v. LockerAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
- Ryan v. WeinerCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.