Legal Opinion
Folmer Graflex Corporation v. Graphic Photo Service
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided June 19, 1942No. 972 Civ. APublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FORD, District Judge.
The plaintiff brings this action for trademark infringement and unfair competition. Injunctive relief only is sought — an accounting for damages and profits being waived — to restrain the defendants from violating the rights of the plaintiff in the trade-mark “Graphic” registered in the United States Patent Office on December 4, 1906 by Folmer & Schwing Company, of Rochester, New York, a predecessor of the plaintiff, under the provisions of the Federal Trade-mark Act of February 20, 1905, c. 592, Sections 1-30, 33 Stat. 724-731, 15 U.S.C.A. § 81 et seq., hereinafter…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Nu-Enamel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Canal Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Elgin National Watch Co. v. Illinois Watch Case Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- National Fruit Product Co. v. Dwinell-Wright Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1942
- Philco Corporation v. Phillips Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
- Bulova Watch Co. v. StolzbergDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1947
- Food Fair Stores, Inc. v. Food Fair, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1948
- R. P. Hazzard Co. v. Emerson's Shoes, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.