Legal Opinion
Philco Corporation v. Phillips Mfg. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided January 19, 1943No. 7997PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KERNER, Circuit Judge.
This is a trade-mark infringement and unfair competition suit. Plaintiff filed its complaint to restrain the Phillips Manufacturing Company from using the word “Phill-Co” to identify its products. Plaintiff claimed that such use infringed its trade-mark “Philco” and constituted unfair competition through misappropriation of its trade-mark'and trade-name “Philco”. After a temporary restraining order was entered, the cause was referred to a Master in Chancery, who, after hearing the testimony and the stipulations of the parties, made certain findings and recommended that…
2Cases cited94 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Clairol Incorporated v. The Gillette CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Campbell Soup Co. v. Armour & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
- Brooks Bros. v. Brooks Clothing of California, Ltd.District Court, S.D. California · 1945
- Shirley-Herman Co., Inc. v. International Hod Carriers, Building & Common Laborers Union of America, Local Union No. 210Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Dwinell-Wright Co. v. National Fruit Product Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1944
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.