Hill v. Horsley
Supreme Court of Georgia
Action for breach of contract. Before Judge Worrill. Terrell superior court. February 1, 1913.
1Opinion of the CourtFish, C. J.
1. The petition was not subject to general demurrer.
2. While some of the allegations of the petition were subject to the special demurrer presented, and it was error to overrule the special demurrer, such allegations were not necessary to a recovery by the plaintiff. Without them the petition alleged, in substance, as follows: On January 27, 1911, defendant, the owner of a certain tract of land, executed to plaintiff, a real-estate agent, a written power of attorney to sell the land and certain personalty therewith connected, at a stated amount; *13defendant agreed to pay plaintiff five per…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Veal v. BeallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Mayo v. LynesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
- Ocean Lake & River Fish Co. v. DotsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
- Thompson v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- A. B. C. School Supply, Inc. v. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.