Legal Opinion

Mayo v. Lynes

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 10, 1949No. 32585PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.

The defendants’ first contention is that the petition was fatally defective in that there is no allegation that the plaintiffs had complied with the license law as required by Code § 84-1413, which states: “No person, firm or corporation shall have the right to enforce in any court any claim for commissions, profits, option profits, or fees for any business done as real-estate broker or salesman without having previously obtained the license required under the terms of this Chapter.” We agree with this contention. In the case of Bernstein v. Peters, 68 Ga. App. 218 (22 S. E. 2d, 614), where a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Padgett v. Silver Lake Park Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  2. Bernstein v. PetersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  3. Garfunkel v. ByckCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
  4. Moody v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  5. Barrington v. DunwodyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hunter v. Benamy Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  2. Amend v. 485 Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  3. Moreland v. KilgoreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  4. Hale v. ChathamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  5. Cline v. CraneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API