Legal Opinion

Veal v. Beall

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 15, 1939No. 12931PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Justice.

Where more than one person are sued as defendants on a joint cause of action, a direct bill of exceptions to this coirrt will not lie to a ruling dismissing the action as to some of the defendants, but the plaintiff must proceed against the remaining defendants to a final judgment before he is entitled to bring the antecedent ruling to this court for a review. Johnston v. Motor Contract Co., 186 Ga. 466 (198 S. E. 59). But where a suit is brought against a number of defendants not on a joint cause of action, a direct bill of exceptions must be taken to a ruling dismissing…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Alford v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  2. Kollock v. WebbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  3. Askew v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  4. Ellis v. AlmandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  5. Johnson v. Motor Contract Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Robinson v. BomarCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  2. Gay v. HealanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  3. Turner v. JoinerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  4. Edwards v. Gulf Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
  5. Dodd v. SlaterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API