Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Hudson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 18, 1948No. 31896PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The first headnote of this decision is fully supported by the cases cited by the trial judge in the judgment complained of, and discussed at length in the briefs of counsel for both sides as follows: Garfunkel v. Byck, 28 Ga. App. 651 (113 S. E. 95); Barrington v. Dunwody, 35 Ga. App. 517 (134 S. E. 130); Ocean Lake & River Fish Co. v. Dotson, 70 Ga. App. 268 (28 S. E. 2d, 319); Irish v. Fisher, 74 Ga. App. 631 (40 S. E. 2d, 588).

The principles of law enunciated in headnotes 2 and 3 of this decision are demanded by the case of Hill v. Horsley, 142 Ga. 12…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Garfunkel v. ByckCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
  2. Barrington v. DunwodyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  3. Hill v. HorsleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  4. Ocean Lake & River Fish Co. v. DotsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
  5. Irish v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Blount v. SECKINGER REALTY COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  2. Mayo v. LynesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  3. Stone v. ReinhardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  4. Oti Shelf, Inc. v. Schair & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  5. E. H. Siler Realty & Business Broker, Inc. v. DartyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API