Legal Opinion

Richter v. Cordes

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1894PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Kent. (Grove, J.)' Argued April 5, 1894. Decided May 18, 1894. Proceedings for forcible entry and detainer. Complainant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

The plaintiff is bishop of the Catholic diocese of Grand Rapids, which includes the township of Alpine, and defendants are the officers of school-district Eo. 11 of said township, and also members of the Roman Catholic church, The complaint and warrant charge both. *280forcible entry and detainer. The building in controversy is situated upon a piece-of land described as containing two acres. The complaint states that the lower portion of said building is occupied as a dwelling-house by one Aloysius 'Batsche, and that the upper floor is used as a ■school-room, and that the defendants, on the 4th…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Seitz v. MilesMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Harrington v. ScottMichigan Supreme Court · 1847
  3. Davis v. IngersollMichigan Supreme Court · 1846

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Council of Organizations & Others for Education About Parochiaid, Inc. v. GovernorMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State Ex Rel. Johnson v. BoydIndiana Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Beck's Service Stations, Inc. v. Sun Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932
  4. B. & O. R. R. Co. v. McCameyLicking Circuit Court · 1896
  5. Council of Organizations & Others for Education About Parochiaid, Inc. v. GovernorMichigan Supreme Court · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API