Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 23, 1945PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.

The questions involved on this appeal relate to the action of the court below (1) in overruling plaintiff’s demurrer to the further answers and defenses and counterclaim of defendant, and (2) in denying plaintiff’s motion for judgment pro confesso on the pleadings. As to these, we are of opinion that the challenge of plaintiff is well founded.

' The plaintiff may in all cases demur to answer containing new matter, where, upon its face, it does not constitute a defense or counterclaim. Such demurrer shall be heard and determined as provided for demurrers to the complaint. G. S., 1-141.

“The…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Ballinger v. . ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  2. Harrison v. . RaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  3. Archbell v. ArchbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  4. Archbell v. . ArchbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  5. Walker v. . ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Erickson v. StarlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. City of Raleigh v. FisherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Wheeler v. WheelerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. McIntosh v. FoulkeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API