Legal Opinion

Walker v. . Scott

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1890PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Appeal from Boykin, J., Fall Term, 1888, Chehokee Superior Court. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Clabjc, J.:

The appellant asks to withdraw the case and recommit it to the Judge to “settle the case'’ over again. Appellant’s counsel files an affidavit that the case as settled by the Judge is “erroneous in various particulars, to defendant’s hurt, without giving him any notice of time and place of settling the case on appeal,” and that the Judge has by letter expressed his willingness to give the appellant such notice now, if the Court will permit the case to be withdrawn for that purpose. The letter of the Judge referred to, states that the appellant’s counsel forwarded him the papers to “…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. McKinnon v. . MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  2. Barnhardt v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  3. Kidder v. . McIlhennySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  4. State v. . DebnamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  5. Simmons v. . MannSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Erickson v. StarlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Harrison v. . RaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  3. Lowe v. . ElliottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  4. Piedmont Wagon Co. v. ByrdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  5. Merritt Milling Co. v. FinlaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API