Legal Opinion

McIntosh v. Foulke

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 10, 1950No. 41620PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConkling, J.

This appeal, presenting only questions of pleading and procedure, is from the circuit court’s action in sustaining defendant Emerson Foulke’s motion for judgment on the pleadings in a suit to determine the title to real estate.

In the instant action J. A. McIntosh and wife (hereinafter called plaintiffs) sued Emerson Foulke and L. J. Haines (hereinafter called defendants) and alleged that the real estate in question here was sold on Novémber 3,1941, at a tax sale by the Collector of Eevenue of Newton County, and was purchased by plaintiffs at such sale; that a tax deed was issued therefor to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Fair Mercantile Co. v. Union-May-Stern Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  2. Norwood v. NorwoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  3. Daggs v. Phœnix National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Smith v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Drainage District No. 1 Reformed v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  2. Shores v. Express Lending Services, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Pitts v. PittsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  4. Armstrong v. Cape Girardeau Physician AssociatesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Varnal v. Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API