Legal Opinion

Meakin v. Steveland, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 29, 1977No. Civ. 38673PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LAZARUS, J. *

This taxpayer’s suit challenges the sale by respondent City and County of San Francisco (hereinafter city) of a 25-foot by 155-foot strip of public land formerly known as Ecker Street in downtown San Francisco to the owners of the abutting property. Appellant earnestly contends that the transaction was illegal and void because it was said to be in violation of the bidding requirements of city’s charter.

In his original action, filed pursuant to section 526a of the Code of Civil Procedure,* 1 the taxpayer, appellant Albert E. Meaken, sought both damages and injunctive and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. People v. Ocean Shore Railroad, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Miller v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Harman v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Sacramento Etc. R.R. Co. v. HeilbronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. SCI California Furneral Services, Inc. v. Five Bridges FoundationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. Graydon v. Pasadena Redevelopment AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. Taylor Bus Service, Inc. v. San Diego Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. Franc v. Bethel Holding Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  5. Cain v. City of TopekaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API