Legal Opinion

Odlum v. Duffy

California Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1950No. S. F. 18043PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

This proceeding presents the single question of the effect of the reversal of the order of the trial court denying petitioner’s motion to vacate a judgment of conviction. Petitioner contends that such disposition of his appeal required the trial court to give him the relief demanded in his motion—that is, vacation of the judgment and of his plea of guilty, and permission to enter a new plea—and he now seeks a writ of mandate compelling the respondent court to so proceed. Upon the undisputed facts presented here, we have concluded that petitioner is not entitled to the issuance of the writ.

Peti…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. GilbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Central Savings Bank of Oakland v. LakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. People v. Lee LookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. In Re Estate of PuseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Katenkamp v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Mears v. MearsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. People v. DiazCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. DeMirjian v. Ideal Heating Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. People v. EroshevichCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  5. People v. PettawayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API