Legal Opinion

People v. Ballard

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 30, 1910No. Crim. No. 245PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. Frank H. Dunne, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment against defendant, and the order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.

Defendant upon a previous trial was convicted, and upon appeal from the judgment and order denying his motion for a new trial this court reversed the judgment, but failed to expressly or in terms dispose of the appeal from the order denying the motion for a new trial. Neither did this court upon the former appeal expressly order a new trial nor direct the discharge from custody of the defendant. (Pen. Code, sec. 1262; People v. Ballard, 1 Cal. App. 222, [81 Pac. 1040].)

Upon the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. HardissonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Ex Parte BallardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. People v. BallardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. SlaterIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API