Legal Opinion

Harris v. Bridges

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 19, 1982No. 8127SC1251PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

Plaintiffs first assignment of error is in two parts. Plaintiff argues first that the trial court committed prejudicial error by denying plaintiffs motion to amend to conform to the evidence. Although the amendment should have been allowed, denial of the motion does not affect the result we must reach on the appeal. According to G.S. 1A-1, Rule 15(b):

When issues not raised by the pleadings are tried by the express or implied consent of the parties, they shall be treated in all respects as if they had been raised in the pleadings. Such amendment of the pleadings as may be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mangum v. SurlesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Faeber v. ECT CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Davis v. ImesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. North Carolina State Bar v. BeamanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Scher v. AntonucciCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API