Conway Corp. v. Ahlemeyer
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
This Court’s November 16, 1990, 754 F.Supp. 596 memorandum opinion and order (the “Opinion”) provided a detailed factual and legal analysis to explain its conclusion that plaintiff Conway Corporation (“Conway”) was entitled to the summary judgment that it had sought under Fed.R. Civ.P. (“Rule”) 56 against former Illinois Pork Corporation shareholders (collectively “Shareholders”) Carl Ahlemeyer, Sash Spencer and Charles Merrick (“Merrick”). On November 30 Shareholders moved to amend the judgment solely as to the amount of damages recoverable…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Susan Waltman v. International Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Harsco Corp. v. Lucjan ZlotnickiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- William F. Hagerman v. Yukon Energy Corporation, and David C. TjosvoldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity v. George C. Meyer, Margaret Meyer & Edwin A. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Adkins v. Mid-American Growers, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
- Kostic v. Texas A & M University at CommerceDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2014
- Johnson v. SullivanVermont Superior Court · 2026