Legal Opinion

Kostic v. Texas A & M University at Commerce

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided March 31, 2014No. 3:10-cv-2265-M-BNPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

BARBARA M.G. LYNN, District Judge.

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files and records in this case, and the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated January 17, 2014, the Court finds that the Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Court.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge…

2Cases cited105 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Blue Rock Investments, LLC v. Xenia, City ofDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019
  2. CyrusOne LLC v. LevinskyDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2019
  3. Domain Protection LLC v. Sea Wasp LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2019
  4. Domain Protection LLC v. Sea Wasp LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2019
  5. Howell v. Town of BallDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API