Legal Opinion

United States v. Bush

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided August 19, 2008No. NMCCA 200700137PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*509PUBLISHED OPINION OF THE COURT

GEISER, Senior Judge:

Previously, a panel of this court found that the appellant had suffered employment prejudice as a direct result of the over seven-year delay in reviewing his 143-page guilty plea record of trial, and consequently held that his due process right to speedy post-trial review had been violated. In view of the employment prejudice, we further found that the Government failed to meet its burden to demonstrate that the due process violation was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.

Having reconsidered the case en banc, we now conclude the appellant…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Blackledge v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. United States v. MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  3. United States v. TardifCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
  4. United States v. GinnCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  5. United States v. TooheyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. BushCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009
  2. United States v. BushCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009
  3. United States v. BushCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API