Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Bush

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided August 17, 2009No. 09-0119/MCPublished

1Concurrence

RYAN, J., with whom STUCKY, J.,

joins (concurring in the judgment):

Relying on this Court’s holding in United States v. Toohey (Tookey II), the majority accepts the lower court’s holding that the significant appellate delay in this case violated Appellant’s Fifth Amendment right to due process. See United States v. Bush, 68 M.J. at 103 & n. 8 (C.A.A.F.2009) (finding due process violations when “the delay ‘is so egregious that tolerating it would adversely affect the public’s perception of the fairness and integrity of the military justice system’ ” (quoting Tookey II, 63 M.J. 353, 362…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API