Legal Opinion
United States v. Bush
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided August 17, 2009No. 09-0119/MCPublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge ERD1VIANN
delivered the opinion of the court.
Before the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, Private Marco A. Bush asserted that his due process right to a speedy post-trial review was violated by a delay of more than seven years from the court-martial to docketing at the Court of Criminal Appeals. Bush claimed that he suffered specific prejudice in that he was denied an identified job because he did not have his discharge papers (DD Form 214). In support of his claim, Bush provided his unsworn declaration without any corroborating evidence.
Citing our opinion in…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
- United States v. MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- United States v. AshbyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009
- United States v. SchweitzerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009
- United States v. MullinsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
- United States v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
- United States v. KillionCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2016
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.