Legal Opinion

City of Los Angeles v. Furman Selz Capital Management, L.L.C

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 9, 2004No. B168916PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRIGNON, J.

In this case, we are concerned with the interplay between two unrelated provisions of the Revenue and Taxation Code. The first provision imposes a higher net income tax rate on financial corporations in lieu of other taxes, including municipal taxes. (Rev. & Tax. Code, § 23182.) The second provision permits a wholly-owned limited liability company to be disregarded as a separate entity for tax purposes and to be taxed as a division of its parent corporation. (Rev. & Tax. Code, § 23038.) In this case, a municipality imposes a gross receipts tax on limited liability companies…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. California Teachers Ass'n v. Governing Board of Rialto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. People v. RamirezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. Weekes v. City of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bunzl Distribution USA, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Bd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. 926 North Ardmore Ave., LLC v. County of L.A.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Bunzl Distribution USA, Inc. v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
  4. Bunzl Distribution v. Franchise Tax Bd.California Court of Appeal · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API