Legal Opinion

Brown v. Wrightman

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 15, 1907No. Civ. No. 339PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtTaggart, J.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of defendants. Appellant contends that the findings of fact made by the superior court entitle him to judgment against the defendants as prayed for in his complaint.

A summary of the findings of fact material here shows: That on the fourteenth day of December, 1886, plaintiff sold and conveyed to defendants’ predecessors in title forty-five acres of land, adjoining the town of San Bernardino. The deed of conveyance contained the following condition: “This grant is made upon the following expressed condition subsequent, to-wit: That there shall never be conducted…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Quatman v. McCrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Chippewa Lumber Co. v. TremperMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Duncan v. Central Passenger Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1887
  4. Reclamation Dist. No. 551 v. Van Loben SelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Jenks v. PawlowskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Los Angeles & Arizona Land Co. v. MarrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Alamogordo Improvement Co. v. PrendergastNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Townsend v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Smith v. HoffmanMontana Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Los Angeles Athletic Club v. Board of Harbor CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API