Legal Opinion

Reclamation Dist. No. 551 v. Van Loben Sels

California Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1904No. Sac. No. 1265PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

COOPER, C.

Action to quiet title. Judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff and defendant Van Loben Sels, and against defendant McCullough, who has appealed therefrom on the judgment-roll and a bill of exceptions.

The controversy is about a small lot of 2.6 acres described in the complaint by metes and bounds. Plaintiff is a reclamation district organized under the laws of California for the purpose of reclaiming swamp and overflowed lands.

In September, 1895, one Olsen was the owner of the lot, and in consideration of $924.88 conveyed the same to plaintiff by grant, bargain, and sale deed. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Behlow v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. French v. Inhabitants of QuincyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1861

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Firth v. MarovichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Tamalpais Land & Water Co. v. Northwestern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Johnston v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Hasman v. Elk Grove Union High SchoolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  5. Alamo School District v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API