Legal Opinion

Chippewa Lumber Co. v. Tremper

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1889PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to Mecosta. (Fuller, J.) Ejectment. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

The Chippewa Lumber Company platted the village of Chippewa. Lake, in Mecosta county. They inserted in all their contracts and deeds of lots sold the following clause:

“This conveyance is made upon the express condition that the said party of the second part, his heirs and assigns or lessees, shall not, for the term of thirty years from [the date of the conveyance was here inserted], sell, give away, or dispose of, in any way whatsoever, upon said premises or any part thereof, intoxicating liquors or drinks of any kind whatsoever; and it is mutually covenanted and agreed between the said…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Watrous v. AllenMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Smith v. BarrieMichigan Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Epworth Assembly v. Ludington & Northern RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Frink v. HughesMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Seeck v. JakelOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Alamogordo Improvement Co. v. PrendergastNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Burdell v. GrandiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API