Legal Opinion
Gnb Battery Technologies, Incorporated, Formerly Known as Gnb, Incorporated and Gnb Industrial Battery Company v. Gould, Incorporated
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 6, 1995No. 94-1956PublishedCited by 99 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
GNB Battery Technologies, Inc. and GNB Industrial Battery Company (collectively “GNB”) appeal the district court’s determination that GNB assumed liability for toxic waste generated by Gould’s battery business at sites other than those sold to GNB. For the following reasons, we affirm the decision of the district court.
I
BACKGROUND
A. Facts
Since the nineteenth century, Gould has been involved in the business of the manufacture, sale and reclamation of batteries. Facilities related to this business were located throughout the United States. Waste generated in Gould’s…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Pennell v. City of San JoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by99 opinions
- SanDisk Corp. v. STMicroelectronics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Wisconsin v. Ho-Chunk NationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Horsehead Industries, Inc. v. Paramount Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- In Re Michael Frain, Debtor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Joseph A. Kirschenbaum, A/K/A Ari Kirschenbaum, Appeal Of: Julie KirschenbaumCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.