Legal Opinion

De Sanchez v. Grace Methodist Episcopal Church

California Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1896No. L. A. No. 51PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County denying a new trial. W. H. Clark, "Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Britt, C.

Action of ejectment, begun March 11, 1886, for a parcel of land in the city of Los Angeles. Judgment was for plaintiff. Appellant contends that plaintiff never had title in the disputed premises; that if she did acquire such title yet it was lost by her conveyance thereof, or by adverse user; and lastly that it, the defendant, never ousted the plaintiff or had possession of the premises.

1. In April, 1872, the city council of Los Angeles passed an ordinance vacating portions of a highway in said city, commonly known as Messer’s lane (styled in the ordinance “old First street”) and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People's Bank v. St. Anthony's Roman Catholic ChurchNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Samuel D. Harris and Others v. Jesse D. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1836
  3. Robertson v. . BullionsNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  4. Challiss v. Atchison Union Depot & RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
  5. Swain v. DuaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Citizens Sav. & Tr. Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Pinsky v. SloatCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. White v. JeffersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  4. HOFF EX REL. HOFF v. Natural Refining Products Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  5. Upton v. Santa Rita Mining Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1907

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API