Upton v. Santa Rita Mining Co.
New Mexico Supreme Court
Appeal from and Error to* the District Court for Grant county before Frank W. Parker, Associate Justice. Where special findings are irreconcilable with the general verdict, the former'-control the latter. Walker v. Railway Co.. 7 N. MV 282, affirmed in-103 TJ.
Read the full summary
Appeal from and Error to* the District Court for Grant county before Frank W. Parker, Associate Justice. Where special findings are irreconcilable with the general verdict, the former'-control the latter. Walker v. Railway Co.. 7 N. MV 282, affirmed in-103 TJ. S. 593; Larkin v. Upton, 144 U. S. 619; Livingston County v. Morris, 71 Mo. 604; Newman v. Lawless, 6-Md 298; Plaggin v. Lorenz, 15 Mont. 309, 39 Pac. 285; Tracey v. Harmon, (Mont.) 43 Pae. 501; Dorger v. LaSieur, (Utah) 33 Pae. 701; Northern Ry. Co. v. Jordan, (87 Cal.) 25 Pae. 273; Wilson v. Hoffman, 54 Mich. 246, 20 N. W. 37;…
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT.
POPE, J.
(after making the foregoing statement of the facts). — The assignments -of error are quite numerous-but may be classified generally as embodying seven contentions: That the court erred (1) in overruling defendant’s demurrer to the complaint; (2) in refusing to sustain defendant’s motion in arrest of judgment; (3) in-overruling defendant’s motion for judgment in its. favor upon the special finding; (4) in refusing to admit evidence offered by the defendant to establish the defense of the statute -of limitations, and .in refusing to give the jury instructions as to…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Belk v. MeagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Walker v. New Mexico & Southern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Nesbit v. Riverside Independent DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Erhardt v. BoaroSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Gwillim v. DonnellanSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Humphreys v. Idaho Gold Mines Development Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1912
- Murray Hotel Co. v. GoldingNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
- Oliver v. BurgOregon Supreme Court · 1936
- Anvil Hydraulic & Drainage Co. v. CodeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1910
- Gallegos v. SandovalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1909
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.