Legal Opinion

HOFF EX REL. HOFF v. Natural Refining Products Co.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 9, 1955PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

38 N.J. Super. 222 (1955)

118 A.2d 714

JOSEPH HOFF, JR., AN INFANT, BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, JOSEPH HOFF, AND JOSEPH HOFF, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v.

NATURAL REFINING PRODUCTS CO., A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued October 17, 1955.

Decided November 9, 1955.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.

Mr. Francis Sorin argued the cause for plaintiffs-appellants.

Mr. William T. McElroy argued the cause for defendant-respondent (Messrs. Shaw, Hughes & Pindar, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, J.A.D.

In…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Pierce v. United Gas and Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Briscoe v. Henderson Lighting & Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  3. McCoy v. Texas Power & Light Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  4. Strang v. South Jersey Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  5. Bartleson v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. VEGA BY MUNIZ v. PiedilatoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  2. Pocholec v. GIUSTINAOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. BARBARISI EX REL. BARBARISI v. CarusoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  4. Taylor v. MathewsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. DIGLIO EX REL. DIGLIO v. Jersey Central Power & Light Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API