Legal Opinion
Weaver v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 23, 1949No. Civ. 14204PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
By this proceeding in mandamus the petitioner seeks to compel the trial court to discharge a writ of attachment.
The background of the dispute is as follows: On March 9, 1949, J. H. and Grace Davis, husband and wife, brought an action against Milton Meizel, petitioner Frank C. Weaver, Inter City Company and certain others, for $12,000 damages. The pleading is entitled "Complaint for Money after Rescis sion,” and alleges that Weaver engaged in business as the Inter City Company, a real estate corporation, and acted as agent for Meizel; that Meizel owned a lease on the Mariana Apartments in San…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Dabney v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- McCall v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- J. S. Potts Drug Co. v. BenedictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Montgomery v. MeyersteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pacific Southwest Realty Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Wallace v. PerryIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
- Lohr v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- National Bank of Washington v. MyersWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- Samuels v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.