Legal Opinion
Van Sweringen v. Van Sweringen
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided November 5, 1956PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Burling, J.
This matter concerns the conviction of the defendant, L. Edward Katz, a New Jersey attorney for criminal contempt. He was found guilty of attempting to obtain money from Milton and Zelma Abarbanel on the representation of being able to procure a favorable judgment in a divorce proceeding wherein Milton Abarbanel was named as a co-respondent. Katz was found guilty and sentenced to four months’ imprisonment. The Superior Court, Appellate Division, affirmed, Van Sweringen v. Van Sweringen, 34 N. J. Super. 394 (1955), and Katz was committed…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Offutt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re YengoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- In Re Jess Ex Rel. MorelliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- In Re ClawansNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- McAllister v. McAllisterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Yonadi v. Homestead Country Homes, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.