Legal Opinion
McAllister v. McAllister
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 15, 1967PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
95 N.J. Super. 426 (1967)
231 A.2d 394
ELIZABETH T. McALLISTER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
EDWARD W. McALLISTER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued May 8, 1967.
Decided June 15, 1967.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, KILKENNY and COLLESTER.
Mr. Edward W. McAllister, appellant, argued pro se.
Mr. John W. Hayden, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for the State (Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of the State of New Jersey, attorney).
2Per curiam
Defendant Edward W. McAllister was found guilty of criminal contempt of court for violation of an order made by Judge…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Offutt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Department of Health v. RoselleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- In re MerrillNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1917
- Peckham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
- In Re CarubaNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by7 opinions
- Matter of DanielsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- In Re CallanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- In Re KozlovNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- In Re Ruth M. BuehrerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
- Ducey v. DuceyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.