Legal Opinion

York v. Sevier County Ambulance Authority

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1999PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

We granted this appeal to decide whether an insured must receive full compensation for losses, i.e., be “made whole,” before an insurer may receive reimbursement for medical expenses paid on behalf of the insured.

The trial court found that the insurer, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Tennessee (“Blue Cross/Blue Shield”), was not entitled to subrogation rights or reimbursement for medical expenses under its insurance contract because the insured, Brian York, had not received full compensation for his losses under a settlement agreement. The Court of Appeals…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Thiringer v. American Motors InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Ortiz v. Great Southern Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Powell v. Blue Cross and Blue ShieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  4. Castleman Construction Company v. PenningtonTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Shelter Insurance Companies v. FrohlichNebraska Supreme Court · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Planters Gin Co. v. Federal Compress & Warehouse Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Allstate Insurance Co. v. WatsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Richardson v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  4. Hubble v. Dyer Nursing HomeTennessee Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Nebraska, Inc. v. DaileyNebraska Supreme Court · 2004

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API