Legal Opinion

Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Nebraska, Inc. v. Dailey

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 2004No. S-03-394PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

NATURE OF CASE

Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Nebraska, Inc. (Blue Cross), sued Lemoyne E. Dailey, who was insured by Blue Cross, and the Union Pacific Railroad Company (Union Pacific). Blue Cross sought reimbursement of medical payments it had made on behalf of Dailey due to the alleged negligence of Union Pacific. The Douglas County District Court sustained Blue Cross’ motion for summary judgment and overruled the motions for summary judgment filed by Dailey and Union Pacific. Dailey appeals, and Blue Cross cross-appeals.

SCOPE OF REVIEW

Before reaching the legal issues presented for review, it…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Rimes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Samura v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Shelter Insurance Companies v. FrohlichNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Kapadia v. Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  5. Chadron Energy Corp. v. First National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Geddes v. York CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Cerny v. Todco Barricade Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Dworak v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Turco v. SchuningNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. WesterNebraska Supreme Court · 2005

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API